Think back to your drive to work this morning and raise
your hand if you decided to build a little trust before
lunch.
Silly question, you say. Trust isn't something you decide
to build, it just happens. Good people win others' trust and
bad people are distrusted. Or is it that simple?
What if you knew certain things to do which would increase
others' trust, and other things to
avoid
doing which would
decrease
trust? Would that help you get better cooperation from
employees and sell more of your products?
Trust is surprisingly important if you consider its
influence as people make decisions. Your own experience
buying cars and houses and loaning money should convince you.
"I did it because I trusted him,"
is an often-heard phrase; and trust can develop in a single
meeting, for example, when making a major purchase. How does
it happen?
Daniel McAllister, of Georgetown University, examined
trust in his doctoral dissertation. He studied 175 pairs of
managers from a wide variety of firms, each from different
functional areas in their companies. They had significant
contact with each other, and they varied in the amount of
trust they felt. McAllister examined their patterns of
behavior and compared them to their expressions of trust. He
also compared them to performance assessments by their
superiors.
McAllister first learned that trust is actually made up of
two components: trust based on competence and reliability, and
trust based on caring and concern. You can inspire one form
of trust without inspiring the other, and people react
differently depending upon the kind of trust they feel. It's
also possible to inspire both kinds of trust.
Next, he examined competence-based trust and looked for
patterns leading people to feel it, but most of his findings
were negative. Superior credentials and cultural and ethnic
similarity didn't inspire it, and positive performance
assessments didn't do it either. The only factor reliably
leading to this form of trust was a reputation for
competence. People needed to impress many colleagues of
their competence before inspiring genuine competence-based
trust in anyone!
McAllister next examined caring-based trust and found what
he expected. Those helping others without regard to their
own interests inspired this form of trust, especially if they
had frequent contact. People reacted to caring-based trust
with caring behaviors of their own, and superiors watching it
all formed higher performance impressions of managers who
were
"good citizens"
for their colleagues.
But then it got a little murky for Professor McAllister.
When managers felt caring-based trust for other managers
and closely monitored their needs, superiors tended to form
lowered impressions of competence for the managers being
watched. One of two things must be true: Either managers
tended to pick out struggling colleagues to watch, reflected
in these lowered assessments, or executives noticed this
monitoring and used it as a marker to label certain managers
as less competent than others.
This latter interpretation is supported by another of his
discoveries. Unsolicited actions, taking the form of task
behaviors designed to help a manager get his/her job done,
were not appreciated; but assistance taking the form of
listening, encouraging, and
offering
to help was appreciated. Further, superiors noticing
managers giving help outside their areas of responsibility on
their own initiative formed lowered performance impressions
of these managers.
So monitoring colleagues tends to mark them as less
competent, while doing part of their work marks the helpful
manager
himself or herself
as less competent, and it also goes unappreciated. But
showing concern, listening, encouraging, and
offering
to help is appreciated and leads to perceptions of higher
performance for those who do it.
So now, as you drive home this evening, you can think
about trust, review the day's activities, and recognize
actions that fall into the categories McAllister discovered.
And the next time the opportunity arises to give assistance
to a colleague or to a customer, you may also remember the
negative consequences of unsolicited, task-oriented
assistance, and the positive consequences of listening,
encouraging, caring, and offering support.
Reference:
McAllister, Daniel J. (1995) Affect- and Cognition-Based
Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in
Organizations.
Academy of Management Journal,
36 (1), pp. 24-59.
Supervision Findings, by James Larsen, Ph.D.
Building Trust
Recent discoveries on trust offer new ways to influence it.