Do you ever see frowning customers examining hand-held
scraps of paper and studying their surroundings, looking for
clues to tell them where to go?
Of course you do.
How often do you see unoccupied employees standing in
a location customers are likely to see? Probably not very
often. Your people are busy, often they're guiding customers
who ask for help. But for every customer who gets help, many
more remain silent and make decisions that hurt your
business, like going elsewhere, or never coming back.
Philip Titus, of Bowling Green State University, and Peter
Everett, of Pennsylvania State University, recently examined
the thought processes customers used as they shopped in an
unfamiliar, typical supermarket, and they made observations
they hope will guide all managers of complex shopping
environments.
Titus and Everett recruited 63 adults, handed them lists
of 21 articles, and followed along one-at-a-time as they
searched the store. The shoppers spoke aloud their thoughts
as they pursued the task, and the researchers recorded their
movements and their words, prompting them if they fell
silent.
Titus and Everett found the shoppers used 2 search
strategies, one they labeled
"passive,"
and the second
"active."
With a passive strategy, customers examined their locations
and then scanned their lists hoping to spot articles that
would be nearby. With an active strategy, shoppers first
selected an item from their lists and then searched for it.
All the shoppers used both strategies, but they used a
passive strategy most often, hoping to encounter articles by
chance.
As they committed one error after another, their
frustration was obvious. Titus and Everett recorded these
errors and sorted them into groups. Categories included
becoming disoriented, so shoppers didn't know how to proceed,
going to the wrong section, going to the right section but
not realizing it, misunderstanding a product on their list,
and staring at a correct article on the shelf and not
recognizing it.
The researchers studied their results and found shoppers'
errors all involved a failure to comprehend and recognize
product groupings in the store. And this occurred because
a) the retail setting was too complex, and b) customers
lacked product knowledge. This difficulty was an important
finding and led the researchers to several recommendations
for retailers.
First, merchandising arrangements should be legible to
novice shoppers. Managers should create product categories
that enable shoppers to quickly recognize and locate a
category of interest. Managers should resist creating
separate product groupings that share important features, as
do health foods, diet foods, and gourmet foods.
Second, retailers should create orientation aids in the
store to overcome the maze-like appearance of many store
aisles. For example, consider assigning a letter to each
aisle and a number to each 5-foot section along each side of
each aisle. Armed with a correct destination coordinate,
shoppers could quickly narrow their searches to a 5-foot
section of shelf space.
Third, retailers should create a product reference, like a
catalogue or a computer monitor, and place it in locations
throughout the store. These references need to provide both
locations and descriptions of products, keeping in mind
customers' many errors involving insufficient product
knowledge. Entries should include a description of the
product's function, its product category according to your
arrangement, a picture of the packaging so customers can
recognize it, a location coordinate, and a prompt telling a
person which way to go.
Finally, manufacturers should package and label their
products keeping in mind the frequent errors customers made
trying to recognize items on the shelf. Titus and Everett
recommend more clarity.
Customers create a dilemma for retailers by demanding both
great variety and simple shopping environments. Some
merchants respond by adding staff and training customers to
ask for directions, but this is an expensive solution that
misses many patrons. Other retailers reduce variety and
staff and lower their prices. Titus and Everett offer
another solution which may help retailers find a middle
ground. It should also keep an enterprising computer
programer busy for a few days.
Reference:
Titus, Philip A., and Peter B. Everett (1996) Consumer
Wayfinding Tasks, Strategies, and Errors: An Exploratory
Field Study.
Psychology and Marketing,
13 (3), 265-290.
Customer Psychology Findings, by James Larsen, Ph.D.
The Lost Customer Dilemma
Researchers explore customers' thinking as they navigate a complex shopping environment.